As amateurs, we should very much prefer it the way it is rather than having the
FCC be 100% responsible for "enforcing its own rules." We can be assured that
if FCC were to 100% take on that task, the first thing it do is to make a clear
definition of harmful interference that I can assure you we would not like.
Be careful what you ask for because you just might get it and then have to live
with the aftermath. The League staff are very much aware of what they are
choosing to do and why they undertake what the FCC will not. We, in fact, work
at not demanding the FCC field investigations that some hams think will make
their case. It probably will not.
Let me tell you a Tale of Two RFI Cases.
In one case, a ham had S9 interference. The utility screwed around endlessly
and the FCC finally was able to have a team going there for other reasons look
at the noise. It could not determine the source, so it told the amateur that
because he could hear some signals on the band, it was not harmful
interference, so the FCC was going to close the case and take no action. You
would not believe the difficulty in getting that decision overturned.
In another instance involving S9 noise, and FCC field investigation identified
over 50 noise sources and told the utility to fix them all.
It's a crap shoot, then, right? No, it's worse! Both of those were the same
case in Texas, with two different FCC investigators. Do you REALLY want to see
the FCC enforcing the RFI rules? If so, without ARRL's staff getting and
staying involved, it would have been game over after the first investigation.
If FCC enforces, this will ultimately be turned over to multiple field offices,
with investigators for which RFI is a sideline at best, and a mystery at worst.
We are MUCH better off having 1.5 staff in the ARRL Lab with literally
world-class expertise and experience managing these cases, with help from local
volunteers, doing all of the legwork and turning cases over to the FCC when
necessary. What ARRL has put together here, in collaboration with FCC and the
involved industries, is as good as we are going to get in principle, always
improvable in the details. IMHO, it is a model of consumer/industry/regulator
collaboration that will ultimately be adopted in other ways.
Ed Hare, W1RFI
ARRL Lab
________________________________
From: RFI <rfi-bounces+w1rfi=arrl.org@contesting.com> on behalf of David
Eckhardt <davearea51a@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2022 12:20 PM
To: Dave (NK7Z) <dave@nk7z.net>
Cc: Rfi List <rfi@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RFI] Solar Panel RFI Awareness At Dayton
Dave, NK7Z, you hit the nails squarely on the heads in your last email.
Further, those of us who are members of ARRL are paying in our dues (or
life memberships) what FCC was originally tasked to do, among other tasks
within CFR47. ARRL and the amateurs are now the RFI sleuths, especially
when it comes to home solar power installations. So, our dues and life
memberships to ARRL should be tax deductible??
All have read my past rants on FCC shirking the responsibilities spelled
out in CFR47. Now we amateurs and ARRL are tasked with some of those
responsibilities originally defined in CFR47. And all for free.......
Something is wrong with this picture!
Sure, FCC is severely short of funds. And.,...... maybe ARRL has been
working with FCC for 20 years on. But this is no excuse for handing their
own responsibilities, at no cost, off to a volunteer paid organization of
members.
Dave - W0LEV
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 11:24 PM Dave (NK7Z) <dave@nk7z.net> wrote:
> If only the FCC enforced their own rules, I would agree with you...
>
> There is very little proactive enforcement happening up in this area,
> and I suspect elsewhere...
>
> RFI is rampant, and getting worse, not better. It is a mindlessly
> simple task to locate a grow operations in most cases. Yet the Amateur
> is the person on the front lines in location, and in first contact with
> the offender, exposing the Amateur to possible liability, and possible
> assault.
>
> The grow ops up here are far too big to be selling in state, which means
> they are selling out of state, which means they are illegal. So the FCC
> is placing the Amateur in the position of possibly dealing with a drug
> offender... The real issue is the RFI, not what is being grown, or
> warmed, or lit... Just the RFI, but it is still the Amateur that has to
> knock on the door, and explain what is happening to whoever answers...
>
> The FCC is ham stringed by not enough funding, so we are the front
> line... RFI enforcement has switched from proactive to reactive as a
> result of lack of funding-- unless you are a cell provider... Then one
> call gets instant action, and-- god forbid you even think about starting
> a pirate FM station...
>
> In a perfect world, I would report RFI to the FCC, and they would send
> down a field engineer in a timely manner, locate the RFI, and fine, or
> warn the perpetrator, then followup with the operator of the device a
> few weeks later, to ascertain compliance levels. This would force an
> overall reduction in the amount RFI, over time as consumers went after
> the installers, and the manufacturers.
>
> That is just not happening. Thus the problem gets worse, not better.
>
> This is why I say, there is some reasonable level of RFI that the
> amateur is going to have to accept. Be it right or wrong, that is the
> way it is working, and for the foreseeable future going to work. This
> is very unfortunate.
>
> 73,
> Dave,
> https://www.nk7z.net
> On 5/25/22 11:26, Jim Brown wrote:
> > On 5/25/2022 1:38 AM, Dave (NK7Z) wrote:
> >> Respectfully I am saying that at some point there is a level at which
> >> the FCC will say too bad, live with it. That level will be above what
> >> things were before the solar installation arrived.
> >
> > FCC Rules say that if a product interferes with licensed radio operation
> > that use of it must be discontinued.
> >
> > 73, Jim K9YC
> > _______________________________________________
> > RFI mailing list
> > RFI@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>
--
*Dave - WØLEV*
*Just Let Darwin Work*
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|