RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] Solar Panel RFI Awareness At Dayton

To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RFI] Solar Panel RFI Awareness At Dayton
From: "Dave (NK7Z)" <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 13:51:32 -0700
List-post: <mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
Hi Dave (W0LEV),

Each time I vote, I try my best to take this, (and many other things), into consideration, when selecting who I vote for... The fix is to vote people in charge that can effect the change we would like to see...

It's not the FCC's fault that they have less money today, than yesterday. I am glad the ARRL is here to act as a safety net for us... It gives us some protection, imperfect as it is, it is the only protection we have right now...

73, and thanks,
Dave (NK7Z)
https://www.nk7z.net
ARRL Volunteer Examiner
ARRL Technical Specialist, RFI
ARRL Asst. Director, NW Division, Technical Resources

On 5/26/22 09:20, David Eckhardt wrote:
Dave, NK7Z, you hit the nails squarely on the heads in your last email.

Further, those of us who are members of ARRL are paying in our dues (or life memberships) what FCC was originally tasked to do, among other tasks within CFR47.  ARRL and the amateurs are now the RFI sleuths, especially when it comes to home solar power installations.  So, our dues and life memberships to ARRL should be tax deductible??

All have read my past rants on FCC shirking the responsibilities spelled out in CFR47.  Now we amateurs and ARRL are tasked with some of those responsibilities originally defined in  CFR47.  And all for free....... Something is wrong with this picture!

Sure, FCC is severely short of funds.  And.,...... maybe ARRL has been working with FCC for 20 years on.  But this is no excuse for handing their own responsibilities, at no cost, off to a volunteer paid organization of members.

Dave - W0LEV

On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 11:24 PM Dave (NK7Z) <dave@nk7z.net <mailto:dave@nk7z.net>> wrote:

    If only the FCC enforced their own rules, I would agree with you...

    There is very little proactive enforcement happening up in this area,
    and I suspect elsewhere...

    RFI is rampant, and getting worse, not better.  It is a mindlessly
    simple task to locate a grow operations in most cases.  Yet the Amateur
    is the person on the front lines in location, and in first contact with
    the offender, exposing the Amateur to possible liability, and possible
    assault.

    The grow ops up here are far too big to be selling in state, which
    means
    they are selling out of state, which means they are illegal.  So the
    FCC
    is placing the Amateur in the position of possibly dealing with a drug
    offender...  The real issue is the RFI, not what is being grown, or
    warmed, or lit...  Just the RFI, but it is still the Amateur that
    has to
    knock on the door, and explain what is happening to whoever answers...

    The FCC is ham stringed by not enough funding, so we are the front
    line...  RFI enforcement has switched from proactive to reactive as a
    result of lack of funding-- unless you are a cell provider...  Then one
    call gets instant action, and-- god forbid you even think about
    starting
    a pirate FM station...

    In a perfect world, I would report RFI to the FCC, and they would send
    down a field engineer in a timely manner, locate the RFI, and fine, or
    warn the perpetrator, then followup with the operator of the device a
    few weeks later, to ascertain compliance levels.  This would force an
    overall reduction in the amount RFI, over time as consumers went after
    the installers, and the manufacturers.

    That is just not happening.  Thus the problem gets worse, not better.

    This is why I say, there is some reasonable level of RFI that the
    amateur is going to have to accept.  Be it right or wrong, that is the
    way it is working, and for the foreseeable future going to work.  This
    is very unfortunate.

    73,
    Dave,
    https://www.nk7z.net <https://www.nk7z.net>
    On 5/25/22 11:26, Jim Brown wrote:
     > On 5/25/2022 1:38 AM, Dave (NK7Z) wrote:
     >> Respectfully I am saying that at some point there is a level at
    which
     >> the FCC will say too bad, live with it.  That level will be
    above what
     >> things were before the solar installation arrived.
     >
     > FCC Rules say that if a product interferes with licensed radio
    operation
     > that use of it must be discontinued.
     >
     > 73, Jim K9YC
     > _______________________________________________
     > RFI mailing list
     > RFI@contesting.com <mailto:RFI@contesting.com>
     > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
    <http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi>

    _______________________________________________
    RFI mailing list
    RFI@contesting.com <mailto:RFI@contesting.com>
    http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
    <http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi>



--
*Dave - WØLEV*
/*Just Let Darwin Work*/

_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>