You already pay tons of taxes for your government, which is supposed to
serve you - not the other way around - to deal with this mess.
And if you believe that giving them $600. will solve the problem - you
don't understand the way that bureaucracy works.
There will always be a new excuse for not solving the problem - and a
new fee (or fee increase).
Tell your elected representatives to enforce existing law, or fix it,
then use the massive resources they already have to get it done - or
lose the next election.
That's how problems, that cross property lines, are addressed.
David KD4E
Joe,
Am I willing to pay more for a clean RF environment, yes! I would
happily pay $600/year for a clean RF spectrum.
The problem is filtering devices stop very little, no matter what the
quality when used at the receiving site. Why? Filtering the RF at
the receiving end simply does not work in most cases.
If I can't get to the devices causing the issues, then I can't filter
them, and if I can get to the device, then there is the liability
issue afterwards...
So to answer your original question, yes, if my bill were to go up, I
would be fine. As I mentioned, upthread, fine hell out of the
offenders, the vendors, and the manufacturers, and the problem would
be reduced greatly. Charge them for the location and time involved,
plus a hefty fine per occurrence.
In general start throwing far more roadblocks to the sale, and use of
EMI emitting devices then there are currently.
73, and thanks,
Dave (NK7Z)
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|