Joe,
Am I willing to pay more for a clean RF environment, yes! I would
happily pay $600/year for a clean RF spectrum.
The problem is filtering devices stop very little, no matter what the
quality when used at the receiving site. Why? Filtering the RF at the
receiving end simply does not work in most cases.
If I can't get to the devices causing the issues, then I can't filter
them, and if I can get to the device, then there is the liability issue
afterwards...
So to answer your original question, yes, if my bill were to go up, I
would be fine. As I mentioned, upthread, fine hell out of the
offenders, the vendors, and the manufacturers, and the problem would be
reduced greatly. Charge them for the location and time involved, plus a
hefty fine per occurrence.
In general start throwing far more roadblocks to the sale, and use of
EMI emitting devices then there are currently.
73, and thanks,
Dave (NK7Z)
https://www.nk7z.net
ARRL Volunteer Examiner
ARRL Technical Specialist, RFI
ARRL Asst. Director, NW Division, Technical Resources
On 12/30/21 00:00, Joe wrote:
But Dave,
Are you willing to allow your government/power supplier to add 10% to your bill
*every* month to accomplish this? At my location, that would add, on average,
$50.00 a month, that is *$600*a year!, so that I don't get interference in
anything I own?
Decent filtering devices cost a lot less money!
Joe - W7RKN
-----Original Message-----
From: RFI [mailto:rfi-bounces+w7rkn.7=gmail.com@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Dave
Subject: Re: [RFI] Sweden imposes higher levy on electricity bills for EMC |
Southgate Amateur Radio News
I am for ANYTHING legal that puts the breaks on uncontrolled EMI. It is
getting completely out of hand in the US right now... At least in the
Northwest...
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|