Contact Mike Gruber W1MG <mgruber@arrl.org> at the ARRL. His area is EMC.
Also send an email to Laura Smith <Laura.Smith@fcc.gov>. The more licensed
radio amateurs that complain, the more response we may get. The SolarEdge
issue is not a one here, one there issue. It is very wide spread and
growing every week.
Randy KQ6RS
-----Original Message-----
From: dalej [mailto:dj2001x@comcast.net]
Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2017 4:00 PM
To: Randy Standke <r55stan@gmail.com>; RFI List <rfi@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RFI] Growing RFI problem from SolarEdge systems
Then I ask, where is the FCC???
Why are these issues placed on those who are offended by this illegal
operation???
Does the FCC have any clout ??? Seems not.
This has to do with lawlessness, or by de facto.
Dale j.
On 12, Nov 2017, at 17:43, Randy Standke <r55stan@gmail.com> wrote:
The SolarEdge "optimizers" are DC to DC converters. DC from the solar
panels goes into them. The DC outputs from these optimizers are wired in
series and physically form a roof-sized loop. The fast rise times of these
switching circuits generate harmonics well past 60 MHz. The "loop antenna"
way they are wired radiates this RFI well over 2000 feet. An April 2016 QST
article by K1KP addresses how to avoid the loop by twisting the wires, and
how the addition of ferrite filters suppresses the high frequency harmonics.
SolarEdge chooses to ignore this method. Probably because it costs a little
more.
-----Original Message-----
From: RFI [mailto:rfi-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Mike Kirkland
Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2017 12:31 PM
To: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
Cc: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RFI] Growing RFI problem from SolarEdge systems
To be specific the solaredge optimizer device has to be removed from the
back of the solar panel.
On Nov 12, 2017 12:28 PM, "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote:
> On 11/12/2017 12:07 PM, Mike Kirkland wrote:
>
>> Actually the FCC has proved turning the system off is ineffective at
>> eliminating the interference and the system must be disassembled.
>>
>
> Interesting -- the question is, HOW and WHAT was turned off? There are
> (at
> least) two components/functions of solar power systems that can
> generate RFI. One is charge regulation, which prevents batteries from
> being overcharged. Another is power inversion from DC to AC. In both
> cases, it is failure to suppress the generation and radiation of RF
> components of pulsed currents and rectangular waves. It is quite well
> known that excessively fast rise times, poor circuit design, and poor
> wiring/installation techniques increase the strength of these
> components and cause them to be radiated.
>
> If, for example, inverters were turned off but charge regulators were
> still functioning, they could still be generating noise.
>
> Another possibility is that improper bonding by the installation
> company might be causing noise present on the mains power system to be
radiated.
>
> QST published an interesting piece a few years ago detailing the
> heroic efforts required to suppress a really bad system.
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
>
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|