Karlnet
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Karlnet] different wireless os

To: Karlnet Mailing List <karlnet@wispnotes.com>
Subject: RE: [Karlnet] different wireless os
From: John Tully <tully@mikrotik.com>
Reply-to: Karlnet Mailing List <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 10:09:42 +0300
List-post: <mailto:karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
We are doing some testing in-house and we will be making easier ways to view the stats for clients and such. But, we have not found any changes yet.

For clients that do have very low quality signal/connection, we have found that we can put 20% more data through or so with Nstreme, but this can make for long latency on frames that have to be resent. So, we will look for some ways to make better latency for clients with a very low quality link.

Generally, we are satisfied with the results and many of our customers are. I noticed that Turbocell uses some hybrid that has a non-polling component/mode that is used dynamically in some situations. We may include some other modes as well so that each situation can be addressed specifically.

John
www.mikrotik.com


At 09:32 AM 10/15/2004, you wrote:
Hi LaRoy,

To my knowledge, I was under the impression that nstream was still in beta
(supposedly "about" to be released)

-Charles

-------------------------------------------
CWLab
Vendor Neutral Technology Architects
Maxed-out on Wimax?
Come November 3, 2004 to http://www.ispcon.com/fall2004/vendorsessions.asp
773.667.4585x334 (o)
773.457.0718 (m)
773.632.0571 (f)


-----Original Message----- From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] On Behalf Of LaRoy McCann Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 11:23 AM To: Karlnet Mailing List Subject: RE: [Karlnet] different wireless os


Charles, I just found this about 'nstreme protocol' in one of the manuals on Mikrotik's website. Does this not work yet?

http://www.mikrotik.com/docs/ros/2.8/interface/wireless.content


Benefits of nstreme protocol: * Client polling * Very low protocol overhead per frame allowing super-high data rates * No protocol limits on link distance * No protocol speed degradation for long link distances * Dynamic protocol adjustment depending on traffic type and resource usage





At 09:42 AM 10/14/2004, you wrote:

> >Do either of these systems support polling?
>
>Not right now
>
> >Are theses systems compatible with each other?
>
>Yes, in WiFI mode
>
>-Charles
>
>-------------------------------------------
>CWLab
>Vendor Neutral Technology Architects
>Maxed-out on Wimax?
>Come November 3, 2004 to
>http://www.ispcon.com/fall2004/vendorsessions.asp
>773.667.4585x334 (o)
>773.457.0718 (m)
>773.632.0571 (f)
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Karlnet mailing list
>Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
>http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>
>
>
>---
>Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.775 / Virus Database: 522 - Release Date: 10/8/2004

_______________________________________________
Karlnet mailing list
Karlnet@WISPNotes.com http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet

_______________________________________________
Karlnet mailing list
Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet

_______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WISPNotes.com http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>