Karlnet
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Karlnet] Drop in Throughput?

To: <karlnet@wispnotes.com>
Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Drop in Throughput?
From: "Charles Chia Sheng Wu" <cwu@cwlab.net>
Reply-to: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 12:08:50 -0500
List-post: <mailto:karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
huh?

-----Original Message-----
From: karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com [mailto:karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com]On
Behalf Of Dan Metcalf
Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 11:57 AM
To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Drop in Throughput?


What  is the better to configure routing with karlnet?

Do you setup a direct route for say 192.168.1.0 / 255.255.255.0 

And put each radio in that network or

Do you setup a DIRECT route for each radio say 192.168.1.0 /
255.255.255.252?



Dan Metcalf
Wireless Broadband Sytems
dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com
www.wirelessbroadbandsystems.com



> -----Original Message-----
> From: karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com [mailto:karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com]
On
> Behalf Of Charles Chia Sheng Wu
> Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 12:43 PM
> To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Drop in Throughput?
> 
> >Bridging
> 
> which is a big problem, b/c now multiple clients on all your
towers/POPs
> are
> all sharing the same broadcast domain
> 
> on average, you'll double your latency, and 1/2 your throughput for
each
> additional hop that you bridge
> 
> not a problem for that first hop, but when we start talking 4+ hops,
> things
> can get hairy
> 
> -Charles
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> ---
> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
> 


---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

_______________________________________________
Karlnet mailing list
Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>