CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest SSB Frequencies

To: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest SSB Frequencies
From: Barry Jacobson <bdj@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 12:10:04 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Thanks very much, Richard, Jack, Ed and Pete. Seems consensus is not to
worry about whole numbers.

Best,

Barry WA2VIU

--
Barry Jacobson
WA2VIU
bdj@alum.mit.edu
@bdj_phd

On Wed, Aug 16, 2023, 11:50 AM Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com> wrote:

> In my opinion, you're being fed a line - in many years in ham radio I have
> never heard of any requirement or custom to use integer frequencies on SSB.
>
> 73, Pete N4ZR
>
> On 8/16/2023 10:50 AM, Barry Jacobson wrote:
>
> Hi, due to poor hearing, I am not on SSB that much, but mainly CW. However,
> some improvements with my hearing device have made me more willing to try
> SSB. I am wondering if people always use integral number of KHz. In CW, I
> never paid attention to exact freq, just found empty freq in band and
> called CQ. But recently was calling CQ for a ragchew in SSB, and the fellow
> said I am on a fractional freq and wanted to know exactly what it was so he
> could tune it better. Said was unusual. Is that always the practice in SSB
> and in SSB contests to use whole numbers? I imagine the bands get crowded
> and not always so easy to find a whole number freq. Please correct me if
> that is standard practice in CW and RTTY, as well, something I never knew
> about.
>
> 73,
>
> Barry WA2VIU
>
> --
> Barry Jacobson
> WA2VIUbdj@alum.mit.edu
> @bdj_phd
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing 
> listCQ-Contest@contesting.comhttp://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>