Thanks very much. You made me feel less stupid and upset at myself. But I
will be a good boy next time and do my homework in advance, hopefully.
Let us all stay well.
Barry WA2VIU
--
Barry Jacobson
WA2VIU
bdj@alum.mit.edu
@bdj_phd
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023, 12:09 PM ktfrog007--- via CQ-Contest <
cq-contest@contesting.com> wrote:
> Non-standard two-digit I##x prefix calls starting with I4 were a poor
> choice. Lots of IARU participants are casual contesters and don't follow
> online discussions and info all the time. They have lives otherwise.
> Much better call blocks would have been I8#. Skipping I84 and I86. Let's
> hope the UK guys pay attention.
>
> 73,Ken, AB1J
> On Tuesday, July 11, 2023 at 12:05:40 PM UTC, jpescatore--- via
> CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com> wrote:
>
> The format of the competitor calls was announced in advance, along with
> the call of the spotting station that would put out SSB spots. That didn't
> prevent oodles of busted spots since none of those A4#! format calls was in
> history files or Super Check Partial files - you weren't alone!
> The ARRL log checking stats should be fun to see...
> 73 John K3TN
> Barry WA2VIU said:
> > ... Also, maybe I
> missed it but I was unprepared for double number calls, and copied I43C as
> IV3C. Was there a notice in advance of what format the contest team calls
> would be? Would be good to know for next time. I was operating unassisted
> and therefore did not look up any of the real-time spotting sites that
> would have told me this info during contest.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|