So we won't need to listen to all those California clubs complaining about DX
contests. They just need to suck up every east coast remote station! :-)
Though the ARRL rules still have a waiting trap for people using remote
stations: under their rules if more than one person uses a remote station (as a
single op) during a contest, their entries are disqualified by the one
transmitter/one callsign rule.
73 - Jim K8MR
-----Original Message-----
From: Barry W2UP <w2up.co@gmail.com>
To: John Dorr <cqk1ar@gmail.com>
Cc: CQ-Contest Reflector <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Tue, Nov 30, 2021 7:44 am
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Time to update contest club eligibility rules to
accomodate remotes?
Tnx John.
I was confusing it with ARRL and someone else confirmed that my confusion
was correct. NOW I get it. Tnx!
Barry W2UP
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 4:08 AM John Dorr <cqk1ar@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Barry,
>
> You have this partially correct. The club rules allow for you to count
> your apportioned part of the W4RN score for GMCC. Operating remotely has
> nothing to do with the scoring. You are correct, however, that you would
> not be able to contribute to FRC as you no longer permanently reside within
> their club territory.
>
> As I see it, there's nothing to fix here.
>
> 73, John, K1AR
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 9:37 AM Barry W2UP <w2up.co@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I (FRC member residing outside the circle, and GMCC member residing inside
>> the circle) operated CQWW CW remotely from W4RN (FRC member within the FRC
>> circle). My score counts for neither club.
>>
>> Barry W2UP
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|