Good morning,
Just so everyone knows, the CQWW Contest Committee is taking this issue
very seriously and is investigating the issue in great detail via some very
smart network guys on my team. These spots will have no impact on anyone's
score. However, as always, we will continue to review other cases where
self-spotting is obvious and beyond what has occurred in this particular
situation.
73, John, K1AR
CQ WW Contest Director
On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 8:03 AM Steve Dyer via CQ-Contest <
cq-contest@contesting.com> wrote:
> I really hope we don't have to start authenticating to clusters. The
> hassle to the many global users seems to far exceed the gravity of the
> problem. Every piece of software that uses clusters would have to
> implement whatever scheme was used. It would be a mess.
> Steve
> W1SRD
>
> On 11/1/2021 18:10, K3IB Peter wrote:
> > Identifying bad guys by IP addresses is not a thing any more.
> >
> > I can change my home IP address at will. Good luck getting Comcast to
> tell you what IP address was on my router 3 days ago.
> >
> > I can also attack from dozens of countries around the world by using one
> of any number of inexpensive VPN services.
> >
> > The best way forward is for clusters to start authenticating their users
> with a simple, widely available mechanism like SQRL.
> >
> > -peter K3IB
> >
> >
> >
> >> IIRC, maybe 20 years ago Dave, K1TTT did some pioneering work in
> >> identifying self-spotters, I think through the use of IP addresses It
> >> may be that the same techniques can be used today - or maybe they can at
> >> least demonstrate that these were *not* self-spots. Dave?
> >>
> >> 73, Pete N4ZR
> >> Check out the new Reverse Beacon Network
> >> web server at<http://beta.reversebeacon.net>.
> >> For spots, please use your favorite
> >> "retail" DX cluster.
> >>
> >> On 11/1/2021 2:46 PM, Michael Walker wrote:
> >>> Wow, what a surprise. I just went and looked at my cluster and sure
> >>> enough.
> >>>
> >>> I was running unassisted and I see that I spotted myself twice.
> >>>
> >>> This is not good and the only reason is for someone to ensure that the
> >>> cluster logging can't be trusted.
> >>>
> >>> Mike va3mw
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> VA3MW-7>
> >>> 7215.1 VA3MW 31-Oct-2021 2319Z
> >>> <VA3MW>
> >>> 7215.1 VA3MW 31-Oct-2021 2313Z
> >>> <WT8WV>
> >>> 7215.1 VA3MW 31-Oct-2021 2305Z LSB
> >>> <N2YO>
> >>> 7214.9 VA3MW 31-Oct-2021 2252Z LSB
> >>> <N4SS>
> >>> 7215.0 VA3MW 31-Oct-2021 2249Z
> >>> <W3MR>
> >>> 7215.0 VA3MW 31-Oct-2021 2244Z LSB
> >>> <WU9D>
> >>> 7215.0 VA3MW 31-Oct-2021 2237Z
> >>> <N3GT>
> >>> 7215.0 VA3MW 31-Oct-2021 2235Z LSB
> >>> <AC3LZ>
> >>> 7215.1 VA3MW 31-Oct-2021 2211Z
> >>> <VA3MW>
> >>> 7215.1 VA3MW 31-Oct-2021 2205Z
> >>> <KE1IH>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 1:39 PM Dave K2XR via CQ-Contest <
> >>> cq-contest@contesting.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> GM contesters. Hope you all are resting well.
> >>>>
> >>>> In the FRC chat room we have been discussing the abundance of apparent
> >>>> self spots during the contest. Many of our participants who run had
> >>>> their callsigns spoofed and spots of themselves made. It seems to have
> >>>> happened to enough of us that the question was posed... 'Was it just
> >>>> FRC that was targeted, or was it all contesters? "
> >>>>
> >>>> Looking on this reflector as well as the 3830 reflector, it didn't
> take
> >>>> long to see that it wasn't just FRC.
> >>>>
> >>>> http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/3830/2021-11/msg00174.html
> >>>>
> >>>> Curious to know who else out there was targeted. The were about 10
> >>>> cases in the chat room I was in this AM, and suspect it might have
> been
> >>>> a huge problem.
> >>>>
> >>>> Is there a way for the sysops to track down the origin ? I would
> >>>> think so, but am not positive.
> >>>>
> >>>> It would be great to nail the perpetrator, and some of us are
> demanding
> >>>> it if it is all possible. Kind of ruins everything for some.
> >>>>
> >>>> Dave K2XR Frankford Radio Club
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
> >>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> >>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >>>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> CQ-Contest mailing list
> >>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> >>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> CQ-Contest mailing list
> >> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> >> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|