To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] New Mult for SS |
From: | David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com> |
Date: | Wed, 8 Jan 2020 11:46:28 -0700 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
I've been a ham for over 50 years and I have NEVER considered it to be anyone else's responsibility to hear me. I'm curious where that remarkable impression comes from. Dave AB7E BUT - why is it MY responsibility to build sufficient RX capabilities on my end to copy a QRP signal from W6 on 160? There are a number of stations in ONN who don't have the same capabilities as I have - why should they have to perform all manner of work on their stations to copy your QRP signal?Simply because my QRP into very good antennas is comparable to (or maybe even better than) 100W or 500W into a typical little pistol's antenna. And all of those stations should at least have a shot at all the mults. Yours is one of the best signals from VE3, right up there with VE3EJ, and you both have pretty good ears. 73, Jim _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] The legacy of not working dupes, Zack Widup |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] New Mult for SS., DXer |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] New Mult for SS, Edward Sawyer |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] New Mult for SS, rjairam@gmail.com |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |