CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Robotic contest operating, why knot?

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Robotic contest operating, why knot?
From: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 02:13:47 +0100
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
As far that intervention is just a mouse click it can easily be replaced by
a macro.
And if you watch the bands you will find plenty of those FT-8 robots.

73
Peter, DJ7WW

-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jim
Brown
Sent: Dienstag, 18. Dezember 2018 21:09
To: cq-contest
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Robotic contest operating, why knot?

On 12/18/2018 11:41 AM, Alan M. Eshleman wrote:
>   If I had an automated CQ (which doesn't seem that technically difficult)
that would have been a fully computer controlled QSO.  What am I missing
here?

WSJT-X was intentionally written so that operator intervention is required
before you can have another QSO.

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>