anything can be rewritten--any system can be subverted.
----- Original Message -----
From: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
To: cq-contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 12:08:38 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Robotic contest operating, why knot?
On 12/18/2018 11:41 AM, Alan M. Eshleman wrote:
> If I had an automated CQ (which doesn't seem that technically difficult)
> that would have been a fully computer controlled QSO. What am I missing here?
WSJT-X was intentionally written so that operator intervention is
required before you can have another QSO.
73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|