Having operated all over the W1 for the past 35 years, I can state based on
extensive contest operating experience that there are large geographic
disadvantages WITHIN New England. There is no comparison between extreme
Western CT at my QTH (or extreme Western MA) and Eastern MA, or Eastern NH.
That additional 120 – 150 miles over land to the Atlantic vs. 0 – 20 miles over
land to the Atlantic is HUGE, especially during the lean years of the sunspot
cycle, or during active geomagnetic cndx at ANY point in the sunspot cycle.
And since that difference is on the water path to EU, it is ESPECIALLY
noticeable!
Most experienced contest ops know that even 50 miles or less further North or
South often matters in a DX contest depending on cndx and on a particular path.
Why does that matter? Because we compete relative to each other within the
same call area and geographic region. So you in Alabama are not competing with
me in CT but I am competing against stations in Eastern MA and Eastern ME,
which being 400 miles closer to EU, makes a huge difference. So there is the
relative mileage difference to EU and then there is the proximity to the water
path to EU. If your first signal bounce is on land vs. the first signal bounce
on water you are already behind!
Distance is relative though – if you have a big enough station with enough very
high large yagis at low wave angles, you can make up for some of the geographic
disadvantages – but only to a point.
Is being in the Northeast vs. Alabama more fun in a DX contest? Yes, of course
– we can work more EU much more easily with more modest antennas. And 8 or 9
times out of 10 we should have a bigger score too. The same way that being in
Alabama should provide a BIG advantage vs. New England to working Japan,
Southeast Asia, UA9/0 and the Pacific even though there are not as many
stations to work.
I’m sure that 100 miles North or South makes a big difference on some DX paths
in Alabama too but that it is less noticeable until that 100 miles gives you a
nice water path somewhere and then you will REALLY notice the difference.
And YOU can have that “disadvantage” too – it is called guest operating –
something that I spent 25 years doing – and required countless weeks and months
of preparation, vacation days, work days, weekends and other opportunities
given up for the purpose of operating in contests from other qth’s. Not to
mention enormous travel time, effort and money to pursue contests from better
locations. All it requires is the commitment to be willing to do it and to
make the sacrifices necessary. Are you willing to do it? Wishing doesn’t make
it happen!
73
Bob KQ2M
From: robert f beaudoin
Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2018 8:49 AM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Qualifying
GM Ria
Maybe you have never operated from outside the NorthEast
USA, but I find it
hard to sympathize with your comment about you as a W2 station
having a geographic
disadvantage against W1 land. Your QTH in N. J. what is that
100 miles from W1 land ?
I guess all things are relative but I sure wish I had your
disadvantage.
73 and GM from from Alabama WA1FCN
On 7/7/2018 8:49 PM, rjairam@gmail.com wrote:
> I’m looking at my case. Under the current criteria I have not a shot in
> hell. Mostly because I’m competing with W1 who has an obvious geographic
> advantage. When it was aligned with US Call districts it was a bit easier,
> but I didn’t really try to qualify then.
>
> I guess the dream will have to wait, or I could spend money and build a
> station in the Caribbean and operate, remotely even.
>
> I don’t think it will be possible to be completely fair but qualification
> rules should prioritize skill first if this is going to be a competition of
> who is the best operator. There are of course some damned good operators in
> there but I think some who may not have access to a super duper station get
> left out.
>
> 73
> Ria
> N2RJ
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|