No. When you break the rules and fail to observe the rules for the
class you are in you either get the DQ or you get moved into the
appropriate class for which you made yourself or a check log.
Sorry there are no mulligans here and if the logs were scrubbed to avoid
penalty then A DQ and long time out is in order for the person(s) involved.
So I can get on packet as a SOU and just Xout my packet contacts? I
don't think so.
It is quite disappointing that these things keep coming up and now we
get to hear about stories where CQ says to do this to get around the
mistakes made during the contest. Really? So much for contest and
judging integrity. I wonder what else the rest of us don't know that
have been covered up or allowed for years.
W0MU
On 4/11/2017 5:48 PM, Jim Stahl via CQ-Contest wrote:
If this was indeed a case of “scrubbing” a log of QSOs that were in violation
of a band change rule, the X-QSO function was the way for the M/S or M/2 to handle it. Not by
deleting QSOs.
73 - Jim K8MR
On Apr 11, 2017, at 5:58 PM, Mike Smith VE9AA <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca> wrote:
I made one incorrect assumption with one of my posts in that I mistakenly
believed that all the 2016 LCR's were public now.
All that are public right this moment are the logs themselves, so I have no
way of knowing who got a busted call or who has a NIL until likely the
fall.(? - not sure)
LCR's lag the public logs by some amount of time I guess. SIGH
I was ready to dive into a big power Excel session and crunch the data
(well, not really, as I barely know my way around Excel; !)
So, it will take some doing to 'prove' anything at this point in time. CQ
knows, but not the public at large.
VE9AA
Mike, Coreen & Corey
Keswick Ridge, NB
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|