CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW LCR's and log scrubbing

To: Mike Smith VE9AA <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW LCR's and log scrubbing
From: Jim Stahl via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Jim Stahl <jimk8mr@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 19:48:50 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
If this was indeed a case of “scrubbing” a log of QSOs that were in violation 
of a band change rule, the X-QSO function was the way for the M/S or M/2 to 
handle it. Not by deleting QSOs.


73  -  Jim   K8MR




> On Apr 11, 2017, at 5:58 PM, Mike Smith VE9AA <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca> wrote:
> 
> I made one incorrect assumption with one of my posts in that I mistakenly
> believed that all the 2016 LCR's were public now.
> All that are public right this moment are the logs themselves, so I have no
> way of knowing who got a busted call or who has a NIL until likely the
> fall.(? - not sure)
> LCR's lag the public logs by some amount of time I guess.  SIGH
> 
> I was ready to dive into a big power Excel session and crunch the data
> (well, not really, as I barely know my way around Excel; !)
> 
> So, it will take some doing to 'prove' anything at this point in time.  CQ
> knows, but not the public at large.
> 
> VE9AA
> 
> 
> Mike, Coreen & Corey
> Keswick Ridge, NB

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>