Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW LCR's and log scrubbing

[W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>]

Are we ready to accept that we have a cheating problem in Contesting it 
is not a small problem now?
I would assume in this case that CQ can go over their extensive over the 
air recordings and attempt to pull the facts together.  I would hope 
that you would provide this information to CQ so that they can look at 
the proper time periods.
W0MU


On 4/9/2017 3:56 PM, Mike Smith VE9AA wrote:
> A couple of the locals (and many of you, I am sure) found that we are not in
> the logs of a couple big-ish M/S's and M-2 Caribbean stations logs for the
> latest CQWW SSB 2016
>
> Both of us are very very careful with mults and have very low LCR % errors.
> (0.4% NIL's) (14 calls out of 3112 QSO's)
>
>   
>
> At first I thought maybe they just fat fingered our callsigns, but it was
> too much of a coincidence so we went digging.
>
>   
>
> We saw the open (public) logs and see some big gaps (where our QSO's should
> be at) and 'surmise' their logs have been scrubbed of common, non-mult
> contacts to meet the 10minute and only work mults QSO rules for M-S & M-2
> operations.
>
>   
>
> Should THIS really be allowed?  If I work someone in good faith, I certainly
> don't expect to be scrubbed from their log because they were cheating.
>
>   
>
> I've seen it all now.. Do I have to say "59 - 5, please don't scrub me from
> your log" ;-) <tic>
>
>   
>
> Now *I* am paying because others are cheating.
>
>   
>
> Mike VE9AA
>
>   
>
>   
>
> Mike, Coreen & Corey
>
> Keswick Ridge, NB
>
>   
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest