CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Preview of CQWW Rules 2015

To: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Preview of CQWW Rules 2015
From: brian coyne <g4odv@yahoo.co.uk>
Reply-to: brian coyne <g4odv@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 07:17:35 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
We have adapted to changes and introduced an 'Assisted Class' why cannot so 
many operators just accept and adapt to that without wishing to remain as SOAB 
blurring edges and stretching the envelope with their own interpretations of 
the rules?  
73  Brian C4Z / 5B4AIZ.
      From: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
 To: cq-contest@contesting.com 
 Sent: Sunday, 24 May 2015, 21:08
 Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Preview of CQWW Rules 2015
   
I believe the likelihood of this is up there with the argument to 
preserve paper logs and dupe sheets.  Time and technology continue, and 
we adapt to the changes.

Barry W2UP



On 5/24/2015 10:59, Stan Stockton wrote:
> If nothing else good comes of the TO7A operation, perhaps a renewed 
> interest to preserve SOAB instead of eliminating it will be the 
> result. That's a good thing.

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


  
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>