CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Preview of CQWW Rules 2015

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Preview of CQWW Rules 2015
From: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 14:31:46 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
So using a CW Decoder now puts you in the assisted category? I do not see
any competitive advantage to using one and it allows less proficient
operators to enjoy the contest. Will a RTTY decoder be allowed in CQWW RTTY?
Certainly using Super Check Partial or prefills offers more assistance than
a CW decoder.

John KK9A


To:     cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject:        Re: [CQ-Contest] Preview of CQWW Rules 2015
From:   Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Reply-to:       n2ic@arrl.net
Date:   Fri, 22 May 2015 07:56:31 -0600

On 05/21/2015 11:10 PM, Dick Green WC1M wrote:
Comments on CWWW Rules 2015:

VIII. DEFINITION OF TERMS

2. QSO alerting assistance

The only thing the change does is prohibit
single-frequency CW decoders, which provide no competitive advantage and may
be needed by ops with hearing problems.

It doesn't "prohibit" single-frequency CW decoders, it just means that use
of a single-frequency CW decoder places you in the Assisted category. What's
so bad about that ?

73,
Steve, N2IC

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>