CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] QRP cheating

To: dj7ww@t-online.de, cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] QRP cheating
From: KB8N via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Reply-to: PaulKB8N@aol.com
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 22:53:52 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Is there not a archive of RBN readings for the contest(s) in  question?  
Could the two (or more) stations SNR not be compared at various  points around 
the world?  If signal strengths between two stations in  different power 
categories are very similar, something is suspicious.  Just  asking...  Paul
 
 
In a message dated 5/18/2015 9:44:09 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
dj7ww@t-online.de writes:

Pedro is  consistently one of the strongest stations on the low bands here  
in
Germany, he certainly would detect any problem with his 160m antenna and  
for
sure a 25db loss.

73
Peter

-----Original  Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On  Behalf Of
XV4Y (Yan)

Yes, we need more than just "radiated power" to  have a QSO.
Even though, perhaps KP4KE's bazooka does not show 25dB gain,  but NP4A can
have a 25dB loss!
Unfortunately it's easier to make a lossy  antenna than a good one,
particularly on the low bands were ground losses  can be  high.


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest  mailing  list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>