To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Excessive Bandwidth Rule was: Re: Suggestion for Cabrillo -- and the phone skimmer, new idea |
From: | Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
Reply-to: | k9yc@arrl.net |
Date: | Fri, 10 Apr 2015 15:49:33 -0700 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
On Fri,4/10/2015 10:52 AM, W0MU Mike Fatchett wrote: I have never understood thought process behind not publicly "outing" the offenders. Most of them know they have crappy or very wide audio. They do it on purpose. When I hear someone splattering or clicking, I'll tell them so. If they fix it, I'll work them. When someone's audio is so bad I can't copy them, I tell them so when I'm running, and pass them by when in S&P mode. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Excessive Bandwidth Rule was: Re: Suggestion for Cabrillo -- and the phone skimmer, new idea, Dale Putnam |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Excessive Bandwidth Rule was: Re: Suggestion for Cabrillo -- and the phone skimmer, new idea, Bill Parry |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Excessive Bandwidth Rule was: Re: Suggestion for Cabrillo -- and the phone skimmer, new idea, Bill Parry |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Excessive Bandwidth Rule was: Re: Suggestion for Cabrillo -- and the phone skimmer, new idea, Tom Osborne |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |