Juha and all,
The rule intention is to prevent simultaneous CQ from one station.
Main driver is available bandwidth.
By this rule, for example 160SSB can be used in Europe.
Without this rule, there could be only 20 or even less multi stations
calling CQ on 160SSB.
The band would be full.
Same applies to many other bands.
The rule allows simultaneous CQ and S&P.
You might be surprised today's best M/S stations use three
transceivers on the run band.
Imagine all those calling CQ.
One after another; covering three frequencies on an already crowded band.
In case you missed something, I guess you have my mobile phone number.
73,
Jukka OH6LI
2011/8/18 Juha Rantanen <rantalaane@gmail.com>:
> CQWW CC has created a totally unnecessary rule change for multi-ops in CQWW:
>
> 12. When two or more transmitters are present on a band, either a
> software or hardware device MUST be used to prevent more than one
> signal at any one time;&xnbsp; interlocking two or more transmitters
> on a band with alternating CQs (soliciting contacts) is not allowed.
>
> Those who have the capabilities of creating such a station that allows
> alternate CQ's on the same band and the skills to use it efficiently
> should be allowed to do it. I wonder what is behind this rule again?
> We have seen past few days that the signal interlocking rule can be
> enforced is one wants to it as RDXC CC has done.
>
> Juha OH6XX
>
> "CQWW - Stone Age contesting!"
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|