CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] KR2Q - RX1CQ

To: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] KR2Q - RX1CQ
From: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 21:59:42 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 06:33:13PM -0500, Kelly Taylor wrote:


> Remember how those 'in the know' claimed that open logs would 'put
> to rest all accusations of unfairness'?  As we have seen, open logs
> did not put the matter to rest, and neither will open UBN reports.

While I am not opposed to open UBN's I really do not see the point.

Many electrons have been wasted here in the last week or so about
the calls in the subject of this email message.  And anyone that 
thinks something unfair happened should be able to look at the logs
and see for themselves. As others have suggested - check them again. 

It is not that open logs have not helped - it is that anyone can
throw out the idea that something is amiss and stir things up.
This you can not stop - but it seems to me with the open logs it 
is a simple matter to run one of the number of tools across them or 
even just look at them and the differences would likely be obvious.


-- 
George Fremin III - K5TR
geoiii@kkn.net
http://www.kkn.net/~k5tr


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>