CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Keeping 'em honest

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Keeping 'em honest
From: "Rytis LY4U" <cq-contest@lyradio.org>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 10:23:50 -0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Being at the "DX" side of the pileup, not signing after every QSO is in no 
way a matter of keeping max rate (which in my opinion is very questionable 
anyway). It's tactically justified as you try to pick those 3-5 stations who 
already know your call and are still calling - QRP, little pistols, casual, 
off your antenna pattern etc. How can this be called "unsportmanslike"? As 
long as the specific Contest rules don't require to sign after every QSO, I 
will always try to sign just "TU" as long as possible while there are takers 
still.

And by the way, have never in my conscious contesting life called a station, 
without hearing the callsign, no matter how long I need to wait, this is the 
way it is. But sometimes I do "?" or "CL?" ;)

73 Rytis LY4U
signed IU9T M/S in CQ CW



>One could argue that not signing your call after every QSO is also
>unsportsmanlike conduct.  I disagree (think: pileup management), but
>that's my opinion.
>
>73 - Jim AD1C

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>