CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] License

To: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] License
From: "Yuri VE3DZ" <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>
Reply-to: Yuri VE3DZ <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 11:57:27 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Ken, IMO, the CQ WW Contest rules paragraph "XXII. DQ: Violation of amateur 
radio regulations
in the country of the contestant..." does not make any difference for DQ 
grounds.
A lot of EU countries have specific band plans requirements.

73 Yuri  VE3DZ


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kenneth E. Harker" Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 9:51 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] License


> There's a big difference between someone not having a valid license and
> someone not following a voluntary, regional band plan.
>
> Besides, split-frequency QSOs on 40 are going to be much less common
> from now on - I bet this is a rare issue in the future.
>

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>