Yuri,
I would only assume that proof of licensing would be required if there
was reasonable doubt that it did not exist. Based on the information in
the article it sounded like the complaints from within Columbia gave
them reasonable doubt as to whether it was a legitimate operation. I
may be wrong but doubt the committee would want to get into reviewing
copies of licenses on a regular basis if there is no reason to suspect a
problem.
Stan, K5GO
----- Original Message -----
From: "Yuri VE3DZ" <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 1:04 PM
Subject: [CQ-Contest] License
>I just read this article:
> http://www.radio-sport.net/hk_ra3co2.htm
> Is this official? I mean the DQ...
> Does it mean that every station operating from a DX location
> (especially guest ops) and making it into the top ten will now need to
> submit a proof of licensing to the CQ WW Contest committee?
>
> Yuri VE3DZ
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|