On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 06:00:20PM -0400, Yuri VE3DZ wrote:
> Well, then how, for instance, about a bunch of Europeans answering
> split-CQ's of the U.S. stations below 7040?
> A lot of them are not allowed to run SSB below that frequency.
> Should the CQ WW committee DQ them if someone raises complaint?
>
> Just curious, how far should that go.
There's a big difference between someone not having a valid license and
someone not following a voluntary, regional band plan.
Besides, split-frequency QSOs on 40 are going to be much less common
from now on - I bet this is a rare issue in the future.
> 73 Yuri VE3DZ
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jukka Klemola" <jukka.klemola@elisanet.fi>
> To: "'Yuri VE3DZ'" <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>
> Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 4:59 PM
> Subject: VS: [CQ-Contest] License
>
>
> I think it just means operations must be legitimate, nothing more.
>
> 73,
> Jukka OH6LI
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
--
Kenneth E. Harker WM5R
kenharker@kenharker.com
http://www.kenharker.com/
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|