But copying a real exchange will slow down the rate and make it harder
to use the second radio. What fun is that? :.)
Barry W2UP
K0HB wrote:
> I abso-tively >>LOVE<< it Paul.
>
> No way for the receiver to get a good Q except to copy it in real time
> without any software crutch.
>
> 73, de Hans, K0HB
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>
> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:34 PM
> To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Signal Report
>
>
>> Like I said before... What's wrong with a random number? Your logging
>> program issues one that you pass on to the other station and his does the
>> same for him to send to you. No more mindless 59 5 or enn e junk. No
>> prefilling of the exchange. You'd have to be able to pay as much attention
>> in the 47th hour as you would in the 1st. Rates would drop but it'd also
>> be
>> more interesting.
>>
>> 73 -- Paul VO1HE
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.16/1843 - Release Date: 12/11/2008
> 8:36 AM
>
>
--
Barry Kutner, W2UP Newtown, PA
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|