CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Signal Report

To: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Signal Report
From: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Reply-to: K0HB <K0HB@ARRL.ORG>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 21:19:08 -0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I abso-tively >>LOVE<< it Paul.

No way for the receiver to get a good Q except to copy it in real time 
without any software crutch.

73, de Hans, K0HB

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:34 PM
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Signal Report

> Like I said before... What's wrong with a random number? Your logging
> program issues one that you pass on to the other station and his does the
> same for him to send to you. No more mindless 59 5 or enn e junk. No
> prefilling of the exchange. You'd have to be able to pay as much attention
> in the 47th hour as you would in the 1st. Rates would drop but it'd also 
> be
> more interesting.
>
> 73 -- Paul VO1HE
>
 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>