To: | "cq-contest@contesting.com >> CQ Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange |
From: | Mike Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu> |
Date: | Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:37:39 -0500 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Robert Naumann wrote: > There is no requirement to exchange the callsign twice! There is no odd > "double portion" of the exchange! Where did you get the idea of someone > getting DQ'ed for it? Sheesh. We need some reality here - please! Some folk have said that they NIL other Ops who don't send their callsign as part of the exchange. That is in addition to the callsign in the log. Not me. I support changing the exchange to obviate the silly argument. - 73 de Mike N3LI - _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Sound Snippets, Paul Mackanos - K2DB |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] [CQ-contest] Vote now!!, Dale Putnam |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange, Robert Naumann |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange, Robert Naumann |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |