CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Rules - was Check numbers again

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Rules - was Check numbers again
From: "Robert Naumann" <w5ov@w5ov.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 19:34:40 -0600
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
It's not that I don't agree with your answer, but your answer was discussing
"the very basis of civilization" so I am mystified by it.

The CK in SS has nothing to do with "the very basis of civilization" so I am
afraid I must be missing something.

73,

Bob W5OV

-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Turner [mailto:dezrat@copper.net] 
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 10:24 AM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Rules - was Check numbers again

ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Wed, 7 Nov 2007 22:12:22 -0600, "Robert Naumann" <w5ov@w5ov.com>
wrote:

>
>Your reply has failed to answer my question.

------------ REPLY FOLLOWS ------------

My reply answered the question fully. Please read it again. If you do
not agree with my answer, that is your right.

As to "The league has said that they don't care", is that the Board of
Directors, the Contest Advisory Committee, or an ARRL employee
speaking for himself?

73, Bill W6WRT
 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>