But it also says:
The required exchange consists of:
4.4. Check (the last two digits of the year you were
first licensed);
If I can ignore that one, why can't I also ignore rule
4.1?
73s John AA5JG
--- Bill Parry <bparry@rgv.rr.com> wrote:
> The rules say:
>
> Exchange: The required exchange consists of:
> 4.1. A consecutive serial number;
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf
> Of John Geiger
> Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 2:06 PM
> To: Gerry Hull; Zack Widup; Cq-Contest Reflector
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Check numbers again
>
> Given that most contesters are used to copying 599
> or
> 5nn in the exchange, would it be ok to use 599 as
> the
> serial number for every QSO, as long as my log
> showed
> that it was the SN sent for each QSO? That should
> be
> easier for people to copy as opposed to all
> different
> sorts of serial numbers.
>
> 73s John AA5JG
>
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|