| To: | "CQ-Contest Reflector" <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion? |
| From: | "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@centurytel.net> |
| Date: | Fri, 11 Nov 2005 16:35:42 -0800 |
| List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
> 1980: It is widely known and accepted that most of the Top 10 (and > more)in > SS use two radios in one scheme or another. There are no calls for > separate categories. > > 2005: It is widely known and accepted that most of the Top 10 (and more) > in SS use two radios in one scheme or another. There are calls for > separate categories. > > What changed? > > > 73, Mike K9NW There is now a public forum :-) 73, Ward N0AX (tongue in cheek) _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion?, Bob Naumann - W5OV |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Drawing the Line [was: SO2R -- revised opinion?], Radiosporting Fan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion?, Kelly Taylor |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion?, Cqtestk4xs |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |