>From the LoTW FAQ section:
"I am a QSL Manager. Do I need to have separate certificates for each call I
manage? Are there other requirements for me and my client(s)?
Yes. QSL managers and their clients will have to show the LoTW administrator
proof that the authority to participate in LoTW has been granted. A client
station owner/operator who resides permanently outside the United States,
should submit a note of permission, a license copy, and a copy of one other
official document, via postal mail to the LoTW Administrator, 225 Main St.,
Newington, CT 06111, USA. This note should specifically authorize the QSL
manager to participate in LoTW. This situation will be relevant when the
client station does not choose to participate in LoTW himself, i.e., he does
not want to obtain a certificate and send the logs to LoTW directly.
QSL managers for temporary stations, or DXpedition stations, will have to
submit the normal license and other necessary documentation via the postal
mail to the LoTW Administrator after they apply for a certificate for the
managed call. The QSL Manager should have previously obtained a certificate
for his primary call".
So, if I've read this correctly, SOMEONE (like G3SWH, apparently Igor's
manager), must have submitted the documents that Igor didn't want to submit
himself.
Stu KC1F
----- Original Message -----
From: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@r66.ru>
To: "Vladimir V. Sidorov" <eu1sa@belsonet.net>; <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W.
> Not at all Vladimir. I did not blame LOTW for forged confirmations. I
> just said that I did not send them by post required photocopies and
> I did not upload there my logs. But I did give the permission to my
> QSL manager to upload my logs to the LOTW. That was quite a while
> ago. I do not know if there is a special procedure for QSL managers
> with LOTW but when you get my card from my manager and them submit it
> for DXCC does ARRL question its authenticity? I guess not. So I do
> not see why it should be different in case of the LOTW.
>
> 73, Igor UA9CDC
>
>
> > Igor,
> > You have made a very serious statement. In fact, you blame LoTW for
> forged
> > confirmations or so. But you ARE on LoTW! I have found 7 QSLs in
> the LoTW
> > for contacts with you.
> > Can you please kindly check with your manager whether your logs
> were
> > uploaded to the LoTW or not, as you state. And how come, if you
> say, no
> > validation documents were ptovided to the ARRL.
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Vladimir EU1SA
> >
> > ---
> >
> > >> Yes, I read UA9CDC's message and also refer to the response from
> > > Art RX9TX. I can confirm what Art
> > >> says...I have a LotW QSL from UA9CDC. :))
> > >>
> > >> 73, Ted W4NZ
> > >
> > > Isn't it interesting Ted? And yet I never sent my logs or
> photocopy
> > > of my licence and passport by post to the LOTW as they require.
> > > So you only confirm that despite of extra security of the LOTW
> there
> > > are other ways of doing that :)))
> > > I only send logs to my manager. NO TQ or other silly files. Just
> > > ADIF.
> > > 73, Igor UA9CDC
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|