CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W.

To: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>,"'Simon Pearson'" <lists+1@attenuate.org>,"'Simon Brown'" <simon.brown@kns.ch>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W.
From: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:51:58 -0700
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
At 06:18 AM 7/26/2005, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
>When Bill or David log into an account, their band/broker downloads
>an encryption key to the remote terminal to protect the transaction.
>If Bill or David were another bank or a merchant doing a large number
>of "batch" transactions, they would have to obtain a certificate
>(key) to prepare that "transmittal" off-line.
>
>This is the case of LotW, that key is obtained in advance and stored
>on the user's computer.  This stored key is used to prepare "batch"
>uploads in advance so that the user does not need to enter each QSO
>by hand while on-line.

_________________________________________________

If the LoTW security method is better, why don't the banks use it?

Conversely, if the bank's security method is both simpler and adequate, why 
doesn't LoTW use it?

Bill, W6WRT

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>