Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 223, Issue 4

To: "amps@contesting.com" <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 223, Issue 4
From: Kevin Adam <n9iww@LIVE.COM>
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 22:34:08 +0000
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Ham diode 10kv  15kv  qsl  advertiser 2000 

-----Original Message-----
From: Amps <amps-bounces@contesting.com> On Behalf Of 
amps-request@contesting.com
Sent: Thursday, July 1, 2021 6:31 PM
To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Amps Digest, Vol 223, Issue 4

Send Amps mailing list submissions to
        amps@contesting.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.contesting.com%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Famps&amp;data=04%7C01%7C%7C213399ba6dfc457a145308d93cdfe5f2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637607754602372354%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=ELway3H6LE%2F3%2B5DI9E9ikv8ZPeq8TPxKoLMxjsmDGuE%3D&amp;reserved=0
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        amps-request@contesting.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
        amps-owner@contesting.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: 
Contents of Amps digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Cleaning open frame TR relay (BILL KENNAMER)
   2. 1N Diodes (jim.thom jim.thom@telus.net)
   3. Re: Cleaning open frame TR relay (Steve Lott)
   4. Re: Swan Mark 1 on 160 meters (Peter Voelpel)
   5. Swan Mark 1 on 160 meters (jim.thom jim.thom@telus.net)
   6. Re: Swan Mark 1 on 160 meters (Jim Brown)
   7. Re: 1N Diodes (Adrian)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 16:06:14 +0000 (UTC)
From: BILL KENNAMER <k5fuv@prodigy.net>
To: 'Mark - N5OT' <r-emails@n5ot.com>,  "amps@contesting.com"
        <amps@contesting.com>,  Jeff DePolo <jd0@broadsci.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Cleaning open frame TR relay
Message-ID: <341582729.127613.1625155574677@mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

 Even printer paper works.
K5FUV

    On Thursday, July 1, 2021, 10:48:28 AM CDT, Jeff DePolo <jd0@broadsci.com> 
wrote:  
 
 > What's the best way to clean the contacts of an open-frame TR relay?
> I'm hoping to just clean the relay without disassembing the amp, but 
> the contacts are a little hard to get at.

Start with something non-abrasive like a piece of cardstock.? First run it 
through dry, then take another clean piece of the same with a drop of IPA or 
contact cleaner on it.? 

If that doesn't do the job, use a aontact burnishing tool.? Jonard is probably 
the most common.? If you need something small, the disposable type are the way 
to go as you can cut them into smaller/shorter pieces then grab it with a pair 
of needle-nose pliers, forceps, or whatever.? After the burnishing tool, run a 
piece of cardstock with IPA or contact cleaner through just to make sure 
nothing is left behind.

??? ??? ??? ??? ??? --- Jeff WN3A



_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.contesting.com%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Famps&amp;data=04%7C01%7C%7C213399ba6dfc457a145308d93cdfe5f2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637607754602372354%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=ELway3H6LE%2F3%2B5DI9E9ikv8ZPeq8TPxKoLMxjsmDGuE%3D&amp;reserved=0
  

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 09:15:20 -0700
From: "jim.thom jim.thom@telus.net" <jim.thom@telus.net>
To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: [Amps] 1N Diodes
Message-ID:
        <CAB4ZMgso7VotGG2k3Y9orVnwonP9P89Nn1zYXoMfY4PMmi5G-w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 08:08:40 +0800
From: Alek Petkovic <vk6apk@bigpond.com>
To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] 1N Diodes


<NO!. Leave the higher voltage rated diode/s in there. Don't go backwards <and 
risk it failng again.

<As Lou said, be safe and stick 1N5408s in there. They do NOT affect any <thing 
else in the amp. They just have a much higher rating and safety <factor.

<73, Alek, VK6APK

## The safety diode is wired  directly between the B- of the HV filter cap
assy...to the chassis, that's it, done.   IF the  B+ arcs from anode to
grid, or  to the chassis, 1000-5000 vdc of  B+ is more than ample to turn
on the diode,  regardless of its  PIV rating voltage.   The diode will
start to conduct with just .5 vdc..and you have way the heck more than
that,  you have the full B+ !.   Fault path is from  B+  to  grid /
chassis..then along the chassis, up from the chassis onto the positive (
un-banded) end of the safety diode...then back to the B-  of the HV filter
cap assy...completing the loop.    Then either the B+ fuse open up, or the
mains breakers open off.   A  25-50 ohm resistor should be used in the B+
lead, to limit the fault current to a safe value.  IF a HV fuse is used, the 
fuse should be  prior to the 25-50 ohm glitch resistor assy.

##  Forget the  1N4001, or  1N4007  junk, they only have like a 30 amp surge 
rating.  The  1N5408 has a 200 amp surge rating..and the  6A10 /
PM-600  series of diodes have a 400 amp  surge rating.  The  10AO8 has a
600 amp surge rating.   I typ will use 2-4 x 6A10's in parallel, all
pointed in the same direction, to make one big diode.  Then I end up with a
800-1600 amp surge rated  safety diode assy.  Then u can cro-bar the B+ till 
hell freezes over, and they will never fail.

##  The puny  1N4002 and  1N4007 with it's  30 amp surge rating is too small 
for a safety diode. ( u would have to parallel 7 of em to equal a single 
1N5408).  With no glitch resistor used, there is nothing to limit the fault 
current.  Even a 2500 vdc supply + a 25 /  50 ohm glitch resistor will result 
in  100 / 50 amp fault current.
When the 1N4002/007 diode fails, it will fail shorted.  With the diode shorted, 
your B- is now bonded to the chassis...via the shorted diode...and your grid + 
plate current can't be measured.

##  Just use the right diode to begin with..and that's not the 1N400X series.

Jim   VE7RF


------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 11:23:19 -0500
From: Steve Lott <lottsphoto@gmail.com>
To: BILL KENNAMER <k5fuv@prodigy.net>
Cc: Jeff DePolo <jd0@broadsci.com>, Mark - N5OT <r-emails@n5ot.com>,
        "amps@contesting.com" <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Cleaning open frame TR relay
Message-ID:
        <CAH1YVzgMT-hJrCqcwMYcxkqsLuqm41DN2d+iaD=9e2UU1v3YQA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

A dollar bill works as well in a clinch

Steve
KG5VK

On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 11:06 AM BILL KENNAMER <k5fuv@prodigy.net> wrote:

>  Even printer paper works.
> K5FUV
>
>     On Thursday, July 1, 2021, 10:48:28 AM CDT, Jeff DePolo < 
> jd0@broadsci.com> wrote:
>
>  > What's the best way to clean the contacts of an open-frame TR relay?
> > I'm hoping to just clean the relay without disassembing the amp, but 
> > the contacts are a little hard to get at.
>
> Start with something non-abrasive like a piece of cardstock.  First 
> run it through dry, then take another clean piece of the same with a 
> drop of IPA or contact cleaner on it.
>
> If that doesn't do the job, use a aontact burnishing tool.  Jonard is 
> probably the most common.  If you need something small, the disposable 
> type are the way to go as you can cut them into smaller/shorter pieces 
> then grab it with a pair of needle-nose pliers, forceps, or whatever.  
> After the burnishing tool, run a piece of cardstock with IPA or 
> contact cleaner through just to make sure nothing is left behind.
>
>                     --- Jeff WN3A
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.
> contesting.com%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Famps&amp;data=04%7C01%7C%7C21339
> 9ba6dfc457a145308d93cdfe5f2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0
> %7C637607754602372354%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQ
> IjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=ELway3H6LE
> %2F3%2B5DI9E9ikv8ZPeq8TPxKoLMxjsmDGuE%3D&amp;reserved=0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.
> contesting.com%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Famps&amp;data=04%7C01%7C%7C21339
> 9ba6dfc457a145308d93cdfe5f2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0
> %7C637607754602372354%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQ
> IjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=ELway3H6LE
> %2F3%2B5DI9E9ikv8ZPeq8TPxKoLMxjsmDGuE%3D&amp;reserved=0
>
--
Steve
*KG5VK*
Tele 318-470-9806
ARRL NTX Section Manager
*Please note: My Out Going Email address is LottsPhoto@Gmail.com* 
*KG5VK@ARRL.ORG <KG5VK@ARRL.ORG> is forwarded to my Gmail address*


------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 18:50:09 +0200
From: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Swan Mark 1 on 160 meters
Message-ID: <F0247BFED9DE4C909DE1E641FC30DBC1@DJ7WWPC1>
Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="us-ascii"

Fair-Rite does not produce powdered iron cores.

73
Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Amps [mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jim Brown
Sent: Donnerstag, 1. Juli 2021 11:19
To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Swan Mark 1 on 160 meters

On 6/30/2021 7:46 PM, Jim wrote:
> Jim
> 
> We were speaking of using toroids for RF TANK CIRCUITS.
> 
> Not common mode chokes.

I clearly understand that, and I'm pointing out how you and other 
designers can figure out which materials are suitable for THOSE uses, 
which are inductive. You clearly did not read or study my post. I 
suggest that you carefully study it and use what you learn to study the 
Fair-Rite data.



------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 09:54:46 -0700
From: "jim.thom jim.thom@telus.net" <jim.thom@telus.net>
To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: [Amps] Swan Mark 1 on 160 meters
Message-ID:
        <CAB4ZMgtPyXg6oJ86FyL4q0uN2Tco-yHnAg2kJwp2VXwxuYNaeA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 02:19:03 -0700
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps]
On 6/30/2021 7:46 PM, Jim wrote:
> Jim
>
> We were speaking of using toroids for RF TANK CIRCUITS.
>
> Not common mode chokes.

<I clearly understand that, and I'm pointing out how you and other
<designers can figure out which materials are suitable for THOSE uses,
<which are inductive. You clearly did not read or study my post. I
<suggest that you carefully study it and use what you learn to study the
<Fair-Rite data.

<Your post suggests that ALL magnetic materials in toroid form are all
<same, but, in fact, there are HUGE differences between magnetic
<materials made as toroids. We've used resistors with radial leads for a
<century, but all resistors are not the same. And so on.

<73, Jim K9YC

##  what's used for  160m tank circuits is powdered iron  toroids, type 2.
These are the red ones.  Permeability of 10.

##  I would like to know the config of  W7RY's  8877 amp tank circuit. I'm
assuming it's a HB amp ?   On paper, with a shorting switch used, there
should be no issue..when operating on any band.   I suspect that on 10m,
coupling is taking place, or perhaps an internal switch resonance issue.
This is the 1st time I have heard of the 160m powdered iron core heating
up, when operating on 10m. I will see if I can find the original thread
from 8 years ago.

Jim  VE7RF


------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 12:57:01 -0700
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Swan Mark 1 on 160 meters
Message-ID:
        <5103f2b8-936c-28a4-4b76-79d33d4a5683@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed

On 7/1/2021 8:15 AM, hzp_electronics@juno.com wrote:
> Don't forget that a toroid is a 'one-turn loop' that can couple to other 
> things.

As W8ZR correctly observed, a winding on a ferrite core is 
"self-shielded," because the higher mu of the coil causes most of the 
field to be contained within the core. The higher the mu at the 
frequency of interest, the greater this effect. But as I noted in my 
first post in this thread, mu (mu' +j mu'') vary widely with frequency. 
Where mu' describes the inductive effect of the core, and mu'' the loss 
component.

73, Jim K9YC


------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 08:30:36 +1000
From: Adrian <vk4tux@gmail.com>
To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] 1N Diodes
Message-ID: <0b7ee9fe-1813-1a37-094c-ac0468981444@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed

RM, said it best with ;

"Protection diodes should not be petite. Big, ugly diodes with a peak 
current rating of 200 A or more are best. I have seen smaller diodes - 
and the meter they were supposed to be protecting - literally blown away 
by a glitch. After some bitter experiences with lesser diodes, I began 
using the 1N5401. In small quantities, the 1N5401 costs about 20 cents 
each. It is rated at 200 A for 8.3 ms, 3 A rms, and 100 PIV. Other 
diodes from the 1N5400 family will work as well. During an extremely 
high current surge, a glitch-protection diode may short out - and, by so 
doing, still protect the precious parts. Replacing a shorted protection 
diode instead of a blown meter is almost fun.


To prevent the negative HV circuit from spiking to several kilovolts, 
connect a string of 200-A (or greater) glitch-protection diodes from the 
negative terminal on the high-voltage filter capacitor to chassis. Each 
diode will limit the voltage across itself to about 1.5 V. Typically, 
three diodes are needed - thus limiting the spike to about 4.5 V. The 
diode polarity is with the cathode band toward the negative high 
voltage. With one simple wiring change, the same string of diodes can 
also protect the grid-current meter and the anode-current meter."


vk4tux


------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.contesting.com%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Famps&amp;data=04%7C01%7C%7C213399ba6dfc457a145308d93cdfe5f2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637607754602372354%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=ELway3H6LE%2F3%2B5DI9E9ikv8ZPeq8TPxKoLMxjsmDGuE%3D&amp;reserved=0


------------------------------

End of Amps Digest, Vol 223, Issue 4
************************************
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 223, Issue 4, Kevin Adam <=