Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] 220 MHz segment

To: "Glen Zook" <gzook@yahoo.com>, "Shon Edwards" <sre.1966@gmail.com>, "Catherine James" <catherine.james@att.net>
Subject: Re: [Amps] 220 MHz segment
From: "Jim W7RY" <jimw7ry@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 17:21:20 -0600
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Glenn said....
"There are commercial two-way operations in the 220 MHz to 222 MHz segment using, primarily, ACSB. At least, for the 222 MHz to 225 MHz segment, the Amateur Radio Service is now "primary" whereas, before, the Amateur Radio Service was a "secondary" user in the entire 220 MHz to 225 MHz segment."

Most of the ACSSB junk has been ripped out. I have been to MANY radio sites in Oregon and Washington where the equipment still sits un-plugged. Although, Day Wireless in Portland still runs a 220 MHz LTR (Johnson type) trunking system in the Portland metro area. Not sure how much use it gets.

73
Jim W7RY


-----Original Message----- From: Glen Zook via Amps
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2017 10:56 AM
To: Shon Edwards ; Catherine James
Cc: Amplifier Reflector ; Manfred Mornhinweg
Subject: [Amps] 220 MHz segment

After getting the 220 MHz to 222 MHz segment realigned for commercial two-way radio, but using "narrow band" techniques, UPS then tried to get "normal" FM approved because of the higher price of ACSB equipment. To the FCC's credit, they denied that application. Therefore, UPS abandoned their plans for a country-wide 220 MHz radio system.


There are commercial two-way operations in the 220 MHz to 222 MHz segment using, primarily, ACSB. At least, for the 222 MHz to 225 MHz segment, the Amateur Radio Service is now "primary" whereas, before, the Amateur Radio Service was a "secondary" user in the entire 220 MHz to 225 MHz segment.

Glen, K9STH Website: http://k9sth.net

     From: Shon Edwards <sre.1966@gmail.com>
To: Catherine James <catherine.james@att.net>
Cc: Amplifier Reflector <amps@contesting.com>; Manfred Mornhinweg <manfred@ludens.cl>
Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2017 2:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] FCC Denies Expert Linears' Request for Waiver of 15 dB Rule

Speaking of this, does anyone know what happened to that little piece of
the 1.25 M band we lost a while ago 9220-222 MHz)?  I heard that it had
been given to UPS, who subsequently just let it lie fallow -- didn't bother
to use it at all.  And is still that way.  Can anyone confirm the truth or
otherwise, to this statement?

Thanks a bunch!


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>