Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[Amps] 220-222 MHz Band Was: FCC Denies Expert Linears' Request for Waiv

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: [Amps] 220-222 MHz Band Was: FCC Denies Expert Linears' Request for Waiver of 15 dB Rule
From: Bob Burns W9BU <w9bu_lists@rlburns.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 08:21:51 -0500
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
UPS intended to purchase amplitude compandered sideband (ACSB) equipment for use on the 220-222 MHz band, but development of the system faltered and I believe UPS lost interest in favor of other, more-proven technologies.

In UPS's place, the 220-222 MHz segment has now been allocated to the railroads for use in their Positive Train Control (PTC) project. PTC will establish communication between lineside base stations and moving trains all along the line. The intent is that PTC will prevent a train from running into territory where the train has no authority, e.g. past a red signal.

Congress mandated something like PTC after the collision between a Metrolink commuter train and a Union Pacific freight train. Accident investigators concluded that the commuter train ran past a red signal, possibly because the commuter train's engineer (who was killed in the accident) was distracted by sending and receiving text messages on his cellphone. Congress decided that any rail line carrying passenger trains or hazardous freight must have some form of PTC.

Unfortunately, like many Congressional mandates, no federal funding accompanied the new law. The railroads are spending billions of their own money on research, development, and installation of PTC. One deadline has already passed and was extended by Congress when the railroad companies threatened to bottleneck U.S. commerce by simply shutting down the railroads. Things seem to be moving along better now and, hopefully, the next deadline will be met. If you are in a position to observe a busy rail line, you may have noticed work being done on the signals and new radio antennas being installed at fixed lineside locations.

One of the interesting little hold-ups in the project has come from the FCC. The railroads are applying for licenses for their fixed and mobile installations, but the FCC has told them that they must gain approval from tribal authorities for any fixed installations on tribal lands. Out west, many of our rail lines go through tribal lands. There have been reports of tribal authorities being less than responsive with these approvals.

PTC has seen tons of delays. Some of these delays have been the railroads simply dragging their feet, some of these delays have stemmed from administrative issues, a lot of the delays have come from the technical side. Developing a reliable, fool-proof system that works with moving targets in harsh conditions across hundreds of miles is not a trivial pursuit.

Bob...


On 1/4/2017 3:11 PM, Shon Edwards wrote:
Speaking of this, does anyone know what happened to that little piece of
the 1.25 M band we lost a while ago 9220-222 MHz)?  I heard that it had
been given to UPS, who subsequently just let it lie fallow -- didn't bother
to use it at all.  And is still that way.  Can anyone confirm the truth or
otherwise, to this statement?

Thanks a bunch!

Shon, K6QT

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>