Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[Amps] Tubes vs. Solid State

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [Amps] Tubes vs. Solid State
From: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 05:03:06 -0700
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 02:34:46 +0000
From: Manfred Mornhinweg <manfred@ludens.cl>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Tubes vs. Solid State


- Hams are obviously willing to pay 5000 bucks for an amp, so why
destroy the market by making amps that sell for 700 bucks? The
intermediate option, making amps that are cheap to make, and then sell
them at 4000 bucks, probably won't live long with hams. They want to see 
where the cost is.

##  I can hb a pretty big tube amp for $5000.00   I can do a really
big one for $7000.00


And another technical problem is that my amplifier probably won't end up
particularly rugged. If you set your mind on it, you can probably blow
it up just by slowly tuning an antenna tuner through its whole range,
until you find a setting with sky-high SWR that just happens to create
high enough drain voltage peaks to fry the FETs. Protection circuits can
keep FETs alive, as long as the high SWR comes up slowly (milliseconds),
but if you have a loose connection in the antenna system, that provides
1:1 SWR most of the time, but suddenly goes up to a condition that
causes those high voltage peaks, this amplifier can be blown up more
easily than one that uses just a few, rugged FETs. The reason is that
I'm using many small FETs, directly in parallel. That's simple to do,
and inexpensive, but any overvoltage will make a single FET enter
breakdown, and that single FET cannot survive the big discharge. When
using just a few large FETs, which is much more expensive, the big FET
that breaks down has a much larger chance to survive.

### Aside  from all the typ problems of SS amps, there is even more
problems.  None of em will run full bore rtty, etc into a 3:1 swr !
So now you require the mating automatic 2 kw CCS rated tuner.You
don’t need the auto tuner with the tube amp, not mine anyway. 
5 kw CCS rtty into a 3:1 swr....no sweat.   Lets do lunch.

##  With these SS amps, you also require a monoband 2kw CCS 
rated LP  filter for each band !  At least a min of 5-6  required
to cover 160-10m + warc.  Plus you have to be able to switch
them in and out.




> As to home brew, there are very few of us who actually do that be it SS 
> or tubes. 

I can't help it, I worry that this is spelling the end of ham radio. To
me, ham radio is about being interested in radio technology. I can
perfectly well accept the fact that not all hams are professionals in
electronics, but I would expect that all hams, without exception, should
at least be interested in electronics, and try to learn, at their own
rate. I just can't understand those people who say they love ham radio,
but whose love for radio ends precisely at the front panels of their
rigs! To me, they DON'T really love radio. Instead, they are after the
utilitarian side of ham radio, such as keeping in touch with friends and 
family, or having emergency communications. In my surroundings, at least 
90% of hams, and probably much more than that, belong to this group that
doesn't have any interest whatsoever in electronics. Hear them talk on
the bands: The weather, the brand and model of their rig and antenna,
and that's about it. I call them "empty QSOs".

###  ham radio is in its dying years. They hand out ham tickets
like popcorn, and they still cant give then away.  Empty QSO’s,
that’s at least one step better than 10,000  brain dead contesters
on every 2nd weekend. 



Of course, anything like that is too complex for the "typical ham", the 
one at whom the ARRL is addressing QST. But even the simplest tube type 
amp is neither for the typical ham, because that typical ham would never 
dare to build anything having 3000 volt in it. Or rather, he would never 
attempt to build anything at all, period!

###  You may be right. No such thing as a slight electrical shock
with HV.   Take all precautions, and its not an issue. My hb RF decks
are separate from the HV supplies.  Each box that has HV or B+  inside
it, gets  it’s  own dedicated HV meter...wired directly between  B+
and B-.   If the B+ HV fuse blows open in the rf deck, the HV meter
in the rf deck reads zero.   Mean while the hv meter in the HV supply
still reads full B+.    The whole issue when dealing with hv is rather simple.
You have a better chance of getting mashed in your car  by a soccer mom,
trying to do some texting while driving  vs  HV accidents.  




> I still maintain SS is not ready for prime time, but for those with the 
> knowledge and desire to experiment it's a great field.

Well, I think differently: I think solid state is the way to go, 
definitely, at the power levels hams are allowed to use.

####  How am I supposed to get 750 watts  AM CXR,   and 3750 watts
pep out.... and measured at the feed-point of the antenna..with
SS.  Almost forgot.... that’s into a high swr.  Repeat for all bands
160-10m, including warc. 


Only at much 
higher power levels do tubes make real sense. Simply because tubes are 
available for several tens of kilowatts in a single device, while 
transistors are not, and would need to be stacked up in too large 
quantities. But at 1.5kW, and even 10kW and some more, solid state is 
more practical than dealing with tubes and their inevitable 
narrow-banded tuned circuits, their lifetime of a few thousand hours, 
and sockets costing a thousand dollars!

###   say what.   A typ 3CX-3000A7  will last 4 years at full  CCS
output.   That’s  35,000 hrs...not  a few thousand hrs. I use a regulated
AC  Sola constant V xfmr.. that feeds the input of a variac... that then
feeds the input of the fil xfmr.  The new Tube is run at rated fil V,measured
at the socket for the 1st 200 hrs.  After 200 hrs, fil v is reduced to the pint
where the Po just barely drops off a few watts, then the fil v is increased
by .1 or .2 volt.    As the emmision wears down, the fil v is raised up by
.1 v.  When I end up with the fil V at +5%..then  send it in to be rebuilt,
for  half the price of a new tube.   The socket for a 3CX-3000A7  is cheap.
The YC-243 has no socket. GG triodes dont need sockets anyway, nor
does the YC-156. Just bolt the grid flange to the chassis..done.   The
F7 version of the 3CX-3000A7 also does not require a socket.  Heck,
they even make a water cooled version of a 3CX-3000A7.



One could argue that a lifespan of a few thousand hours for a tube will 
last a ham's lifetime of normal operation. But practical experience 
shows that tubes are less reliable: Among the local hams I know and who 
own power amps, the spread is about 2/3 tube amps, and 1/3 solid state, 
changing fast to increase the proportion of SS. Most of these hams turn 
to me when something fails. Over the last several years I had to replace 
several 3-500Z, and a few other tubes, but not a single high power 
transistor.

##  I know folks with SB-221’s  who are still getting full  PO
from the original tubes.   I have replaced one pair of tubes
in my drake L4B linear  since I bought it new, back in 1977.




The only time I got a solid state amp for repair, a Quadra 
that had seen extensive contest and DXpedition use, the problem was a 
broken solder joint that took five minutes to find, and one second to 
repair.
In several tube amps I had to replace electrolytic caps, and I had to 
rewind two power transformers. In SS amps, so far I have seen no power 
supply trouble. Of course, the number of amps that could possibly fall 
in my hands when broken is small, but I believe that it's enough to do 
at least a broad statistic about their reliability.

### What is the TX  IMD  on these SS amps you have built. 
That Elecraft  K3  xcvr is crap  at  -29db  IMD-3.  I don’t think
their KPA-500  is much better.   





Years ago I looked into the possibility of making broadband tube 
amplifiers, because I just hate having to retune an amp after changing 
bands or even changing frequency a lot within a band. But I quickly 
found that the tubes' combination of high internal capacitance and 
required high operating voltage makes this totally impossible. Tubes 
force the use of tuned circuits, while transistors give the designer the 
choice between tuned and broadband impedance matching.

###  Using 3-4 x  drake L4B amps, all wired nose to tail in series,
(since they will handle 2 kw on bypass mode),  I just tune each
one up on a different band !  One rotary switch ensures only
one key line is active at any one time.  Simple. 

## the hb 3CX-3000A7 amp and also the YC-243 amp uses 
vac tune and load caps.. + a pair of broadcast variables for the
tuned input. Separate bandswitch for the tuned input and high
power Pi net.  Each vac cap gets its own turns counter..which reads down
to .01 of a turn.  The pair of broadcast variables get a 4 inch diam, jackson 
bros
ball drive, which is calibrated 0-100  over a 180 deg arc =  6 inchs. 

##  it takes exactly  45 secs  to qsy from  15m to 160m.   Just dial up
using pre-sets.   1 pre-set for cw and 1 for ssb  on  20-10m.  On the
lower bands its  1 pre-set for cw..and 2 x pre-sets for ssb.   The secret is
to lower the loaded Q a tiny bit.  Even with the drake amps, I tune it
at  14.200  and its good from 14.100  to  14.325   with a flat  ant swr. 
I cant squeeze any more out of it by retuning at  14.100  or 14.325
so just tune it once at 14.200. 





Tube dissipation ratings instead are true, real, directly usable, as 
long as you assure enough airflow. This difference comes from the simple 
fact that tubes usually have their heatsinks built-in, while transistors 
do not, so transistor ratings have to be given in a way that allows 
equipment designers to calculate the true allowable dissipation, after 
fitting a certain heatsink.

##  large metal tubes are easy to cool.  Plus they are usually
specified with an IN-take air temp of 40-50 deg C.  Now
I put mine in the un heated workshop next door to the shack.
If Im working in the shop, then the shop  gets heated.  In take
air temp is more like 15-20 deg C.  Anode diss goes way up.
Crank up the air pressure, combined with colder air..and it goes
WAY up.   I can easily get another 50% CCS anode diss with that
technique.   For cw-ssb use, the pressure can be turned way down
of course. 

##  whether it’s a tube amp or a SS amp... and it makes noise,
just put em into another room.   Then zero noise in the radio
room..and no heat either.   In winter, heat from the amps
stays in the basement shop.   In summer, its routed to the outside. 

##  My other problem with SS is  eff.  Your typ SS amp operates at a 
lousy  50% max eff..and that’s when run at max output !    Reduce
the PO by half....and eff will drop down to 35%.  At that point,
you have to reduce the vdc a bit to get the eff back up.  The
problem with reduced vdc is.... the TX imd drops off ! 

##  a  1.5  to 2kw output  CCS  SS amp, that covers all 9 x bands, and will  
handle
a  3:1  swr  and LOW  IMD,  is no simple task.  Hats off to anybody who can
pull it off at any price.   BTW,,,  these 1-52 kw  SS  FM broadcast amps you 
see typ
consist  of 1-52  x 1 kw  SS modules, with mating switching supplies.  
Then a myriad of combiners.  They operate at up to 92 % eff..and are
NOT linear amplifiers.  They operate on a single freq..with a 1:1 swr.
So don’t use them as some kind of reference  or standard as to what could 
or should be done  with 9 band ham type SS linear amps. 

##  ONE  instant on  GG triode, no socket, simple un regulated B+  supply  with 
a 
tuned pi input  and a pi output is about as simple as it gets.  You will go 
broke
trying to get  YC-156 power levels  from SS.  Why not back up one notch..and 
start
with a LOW imd xcvr that puts out 200 w pep, without going into melt down. 
The K3, with its lousy –29 db IMD-3   and 100w pep out simply does not cut it. 

later.... Jim  VE7RF   






Note that some solid state devices, such as many diodes and also some 
switching MOSFETs, nowadays are rated for dissipation and/or current at 
a more real-world temperature, such as 75 or even 100 degrees Celsius.

> Depending on frequency we set the internal limit at 100C and max 
> internal operating temp at somewhere between 70 and 90C.
> dopant migration was starting to become noticeable at 100C so when I was 
> in the industry.

That's a bit lower than I had known. Anyway one has to keep in mind that 
these phenomena are time-related. A ham amplifier can probably get away 
with pushing the silicon to 150 degrees when delivering full output, 
because this will only be short-term. If the transistors live for 10,000 
hours at that temperature, that should be enough. A broadcaster instead, 
running 24/7 at full power, will want to get much more than 10,000 hours 
of life from his transistors, and so they need to run cooler.

That said, and having done calculations on the thermal aspects of 
widespread ham equipment, I can't avoid the suspicion that many ham 
transceivers run their finals well in excess of 150 degrees internally! 
The typical max ratings are often 175 degrees or even 200 degrees for 
transistors that are NOT encased in plastic. Particularly brave 
manufacturers even specify 225 degrees. I don't know how much of that is 
due to processing techniques that reduce dopant migration. The rest is 
probably based on decisions to accept shorter lifespans as "typical". In 
any case, silicon by itself survives much higher temperatures. It's the 
migration problem that sets a limit, and the attachment of the chip to 
the case (usually by some solder) sets another limit.

> You can also use *cold* or chilled water. Just draw the water out of an 
> open PVC tank and return to the same tank. 20 gallons will run a KW amp 
> for quite a while. Throw in a few chunks of ice and have at it. We use 
> the water in plastic bags for our picnic coolers , so you just grab a 
> couple and drop in the tank

But one needs to be always careful about avoiding condensation inside 
the amp. At my former job, we had tons of actively cooled electronic 
equipment. There were big coolers to chill the water/glycol mixture just 
enough to keep the outside of the electronic racks precisely at ambient 
temperature, to prevent thermal turbulence. The controllers monitored 
ambient moisture, to keep the water always above the dew point. 
Sometimes something went wrong, and then we got dripping wet 
electronics, with all the obvious consequences.

The coolers were mostly of the plain common compressor heat pump type, 
but in some vibration-sensitive locations we decided to try Peltier 
coolers. They turned out to be a disaster. The place was at 2600 meter 
altitude, the Peltiers overheated due to the low air density, and died 
faster than we could throw them in the trash.

> You can take it down as far as you like as long as you don't get 
> condensation on the circuit board,

Exactly. And with a typical comfortable ambient humidity of 60 to 70%, 
condensation happens at just about 6 degrees below room temperature! 
It's not worth doing, for such little temperature difference.

> or ice up the pump.

At any normal room temperature and humidity, condensation will occur far 
sooner than any ice can form. The dewpoint at comfortable room 
conditions is always above 10 degrees Celsius. You would need an 
extremely dry or very cold environment, to get the dewpoint below freezing!

> BTW there is a fungicide used in swimming pools that will do a good job 
> of keeping *stuff* from growing in your cooling system. I'm not 
> referring to Chlorine.

I will have a look in the swimming pool section of the home improvement 
store! Thanks for the hint!

Manfred
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>