Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] 4CX1000A

To: "Roger \(K8RI\)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] 4CX1000A
From: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:17:15 -0500
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
The 3 didgit EIA code on the tube will tell you who actually built it.

Carl
KM1H

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 4:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] 4CX1000A


> On 1/27/2012 3:46 PM, Roger Dixon wrote:
>> Hi Chaps,
>> I recently completed my 50MHz 4CX1000A amplifier.  However the Eimac pull 
>> I
>> have had for a while suffers from excessive secondary emission.
> Are you familiar with Tetrode tuning?  At what level of screen current
> do you start getting secondary emission?
>
>>
>> The question.  I have recently obtained a NOS 4CX1000A.  However, despite
>> being offered as an "Eimac" NOS, both the valve and the original box are
>> branded General Electric.  Does anyone have any views as to the
>> quality/specification of a valve such as this that is non Eimac branded?
> I've not heard of any problems with GE constructed 4CX1000A's. GE has
> built a lot of high powered tubes in the past and particularly for the
> military.
> I'd not be concerned about a GE tube, unless some one comes up with
> information on a problem with those tubes.
>
> 73
>
> Roger (K8RI)
>> TIA
>> Roger - G4BVY
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1416 / Virus Database: 2109/4768 - Release Date: 01/26/12
> 

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>