Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Should a blower run after amp shutdown?

To: km1h@jeremy.mv.com, 4cx250b@muohio.edu, amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Should a blower run after amp shutdown?
From: TexasRF@aol.com
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 08:07:47 EDT
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Hi Carl, 
 
I have read/heard that about filament transformers before. I am not sure  
where that idea started but have some doubts about the validity in all  cases.
 
The cold resistance of a filament is close to a short circuit at turn on.  
How much current can a filament transformer deliver when the secondary is  
shorted? 2X rating? 4X? 10X? Voltage is not important;  current is the  
culprit here.
 
You are right about the 3-500Z; it is not known to have open filament  
issues. Perhaps the current requirements are low enough to limit  destructive 
magnetic fields inside the filament during turn on? 
 
Larger tubes definitely have open filament issues due to surge currents;  
learned that first hand. This leaves a bit of a dilemma: do you or don't you 
pay  attention to filament turn on surge current for a given tube?
 
Those big tubes are expected to be turned on/off for a limited number  of 
times in their lifetime. We amateurs expect unlimited on/off cycles, a very  
different scenario.
 
There is a lot more to be learned about this. 
 
73,
Gerald K5GW
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 6/3/2011 6:15:46 A.M. Central Daylight Time,  
km1h@jeremy.mv.com writes:

If the  filament transformer is sized properly it should provide sufficient 
inrush  protection at ham tube power levels. The 3-500Z certainly isnt 
known 
for  open filaments nor are any of its tetrode cousins.

I do bring my  250TH's and 304TL's up with a Variac.

Carl
KM1H


-----  Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Garland"  <4cx250b@muohio.edu>
To: <TexasRF@aol.com>;  <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 8:24  PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] Should a blower run after amp  shutdown?


>
>
> Some tubes, such as TH327/347,  caution in the data sheet to not run the
> filament without air flow. In  their case, the filament power is about 200
> watts. If 200 watts is bad  for a tube then it seems latent anode heat 
> might
> also be  ba
>
>
>
> You're right about tube data sheets  cautioning the need for airflow with
> only the filaments. But that's  because the filaments disspate enough 
heat 
> to
> raise the  temperature of the tube seals too high without cooling. 
However,
>  that's a different situation from the latent heat of the anode, since  
that
> can't increase once the power is killed to the amp,  assuming  the 
filament
> power is killed simultaneously. Of course,  if the filaments remain on 
with
> no cooling, then that's asking for  trouble!
>
>
>
> On the issue of thermal shock with  blower left on, remember every time 
you
> switch to standby the same  scenario exists. No problem there, so how can
> there be a problem at  shut down?
>
>
>
> Good point, Gerald. I think you're  right.
>
>
>
> In my view, the largest gain in tube  life comes with careful management 
of
> filament/heater current at turn  on. I keep thinking about how light bulbs
> typically fail at turn on  and how that applies to transmitting tubes. One
> tube manufacturers'  web site suggests a loss of 60 hours of life during
> every on/off  cycle. Yikes!
>
>
>
> I've wondered about the light  bulb analogy.  Obviously, reducing the 
> inrush
> current at  turn on is desirable, but I've hardly ever known a 
transmitting
> tube  to have a burned out filament (excepting really old tubes, like the
>  250TH, or tubes that were gassy). Actually, I did lose the filament on  
an
> 8877 years ago, but that was because of a bad weld to the filament  
support
> structure. Eimac replaced the tube, even though it was long  out of 
> warranty.
> More typically, filaments (or cathodes) lose  emission, or the grid 
becomes
> contaminated, or the tube becomes gassy  or shorts internally. That said, 
I
> still think filament inrush  protection is a good idea, particularly with
> thoriated tungsten  filaments.
>
>
>
> 73,
>
> Jim  W8ZR
>
> _______________________________________________
>  Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
>  http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
>  -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG -  www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1375 / Virus Database: 1511/3675 - Release  Date: 06/02/11
>  

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing  list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>