Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] TenTec Centurion - 422 tuning question

To: <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>, <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Subject: Re: [Amps] TenTec Centurion - 422 tuning question
From: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 21:26:06 -0500
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Actually Ten Tec has the better idea for those operators not used to the 
other way. With 0 being minimum C and 10 the max you dont have inverted 
logic when trying to figure out which way to turn the Load control at 3AM 
during a contest.

I never could understand why increased loading went with a higher number 
when less C on the Tune cap is the opposite. And without a standard there is 
always the chance for error and damage.

Yes, I understand that the higher number is supposed to convey higher 
loading and trying to tell a new user that higher means less might result in 
glassy eyes and brain fades.

Carl
KM1H


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
To: <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Cc: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2010 9:02 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] TenTec Centurion - 422 tuning question


> On 12/23/2010 4:40 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
>> If you meant "the impedance of the connected transmission line", that
>> is only true when the connected transmission line feeds a load with an
>> impedance equal to that of the line.
>
> Yeah, I wrote that badly.  What I meant was the impedance of the line as
> it reflects the antenna at the other end. :)
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps 

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>