To: | Robert Groh <rgroh@swbell.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] Question: Ship Vacuum Variables at minimum or maximum? |
From: | "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com> |
Reply-to: | dezrat1242@yahoo.com |
Date: | Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:21:17 -0700 |
List-post: | <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:59:23 -0700 (PDT), Robert Groh <rgroh@swbell.net> wrote: > >Comments and advice welcome. The vacuum variables are Jennings UCS and UCSL, >by the way, if that matters. REPLY: That's a very good question Robert, but I think the best way is to pack them so well it doesn't matter. I'm not trying to be a smarty here, it's just that they are so delicate in any configuration that you can't hardly have too much foam around them. The box should be many times larger than the capacitor and well stuffed. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [Amps] bipolar input, Bill Fuqua |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] Question: Ship Vacuum Variables at minimum or maximum?, Pete Lancashire |
Previous by Thread: | [Amps] Question: Ship Vacuum Variables at minimum or maximum?, Robert Groh |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Question: Ship Vacuum Variables at minimum or maximum?, Pete Lancashire |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |