To: | "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>, "AMPS" <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] Centurion cooling improvement ideas for AM service |
From: | Bill Fuqua <wlfuqu00@uky.edu> |
Date: | Thu, 26 Aug 2004 19:58:04 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
Actually I said 5 KHz audio bandwidth which is 10Khz RF bandwidth. But I am surprised no one read the rest of my email. I expected to get some responses to the issue about CW bandwidth. And I concluded that it is best not to mess with the rules and trying to be too specific. If we get into a mode of trying to spell every thing out precisely it will the rules will degenerate to something like those for 60meters. 73 Bill wa4lav At 06:15 PM 8/26/2004 -0400, Paul Christensen wrote: > 6 kHz on SSB would be greater audio bandwidth than used for standard > AM broadcast (5kHz). Which was adopted to accommodate music broadcast.
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] Centurion cooling improvement ideas for AM service, Gary Schafer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Amps] Advice on Filament Protection Sought, Harold B. Mandel |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Centurion cooling improvement ideas for AM service, R . Measures |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Centurion cooling improvement ideas for AM service, Frank Mayer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |