Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

SV: [AMPS] Re:(AMPS) sb-200 troubles

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: SV: [AMPS] Re:(AMPS) sb-200 troubles
From: sm5ki@algonet.se (Hans Goldschmidt)
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 11:33:58 +0200
Why not use another plate choke instead of the tiny receiving type normally
used? By the way I saw  in  G3VA:s TECHNICALTOPICS SCRAPBOOK your excellent
idea from 1988 feeding the anode supply at the antenna end worthwile another
discussion. 

Cheers de Hans SM5KI.
----------
>Från: Peter Chadwick <Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com>
>Till: Rich Measures <measures@vcnet.com>, Peter Chadwick
<Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com>, steve thacker <kb5vca@cei.net>,
amps@contesting.com, "'Phil Clements'" <philk5pc@tyler.net>
>Ämne: RE: [AMPS] Re:(AMPS) sb-200 troubles
>Datum: tor 12 aug 1999 10.23
>

>
>Phil says:
>
>>The safety choke should be matched to the primary CB's or fuses to be
>>robust enough to withstand the current fo the time it takes for the fuses
>>to blow.
>
>Certainly - no argument about what it SHOULD be! All too frequently, though,
>it isn't man enough for the job.
>
>73
>
>Peter G3RZP
>
>
>
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
>Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
>Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
>Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>
>

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>