Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Re:(AMPS) sb-200 troubles

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Re:(AMPS) sb-200 troubles
From: measures@vcnet.com (Rich Measures)
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 17:28:12 -0700


>
>
>
>>>When the plate blocking cap fails, this puts the HV across the antenna
>>>terminal.   The purpose of the safety RF choke is to trip the primary CB's 
or 
>>fuses to
>>>remove the HV from there WITHOUT destroying itself. If it is not robust 
enough
>>>to take the "hit" and fails open, the lethal HV is STILL on your
>>>antenna!
>>>(Not good!)
>>>
>>With an ordinary Load C, this is not going to happen. 
>
>
>I guess the load C's in my amps are in the extrordinary catagory.
>They are 1000 pf 5kv vacuum variables. 

?  A 5kV Load-C clearly belongs in a tetrode with handles amplifier. 

> No arcing with full HV
>applied, much less a smaller voltage from a leaky C/block.
>
?  I have never seen a leaky C-block.  When barium titanate dielectric 
starts to breakdown, a short is virtually certain within mS.  

>The safety RF choke in my amps does two things; it protects
>more expensive components from carbon build-up an damage,
>and it keeps me from being published in QST in the "Silent Keys"
>column!
>
?  For the Silent Keys scenario to take place, C-block would have to 
short, the amplifier would have to be in TX mode, and C2 would have to be 
clearly overinsulated  -- and then the operator would have to grab the 
ungrounded side of the antenna.  .   

-  later, Phil

-
-  Rich...
R. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures  


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>