To: | "'topband reflector'" <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: Realistic expectations? |
From: | "Mark Lunday" <mlunday@nc.rr.com> |
Date: | Wed, 30 Dec 2009 10:04:15 -0500 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Thanks to ALL who replied. I had about 20 responses in just about 12 hours. The suggestions and guidance have proven INVALUABLE! I appreciate very much all the help. Summary of responses: patience lad, patience. Follow what is known about verticals, and remember that 160 is unique in its own ways. Mark Lunday WD4ELG Greensboro, NC - FM06be wd4elg@arrl.net http://wd4elg.net http://wd4elg.blogspot.com <http://wd4elg.net> _______________________________________________ "160-meters is a band for men, not for sissies!" - SM5EDX |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: RE66 in the SP test, Richard (Rick) Karlquist |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Topband: VP8/LZ1UQ - South Shetland Isl, Mitko |
Previous by Thread: | Topband: Realistic expectations?, Mark Lunday |
Next by Thread: | Topband: European SDR, PACER99 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |