RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] RTTY Cut Numbers

To: RTTY contest group <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RTTY Cut Numbers
From: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 13:30:19 -0600
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com> wrote:
> One big reason for contests to be consistent across modes is to keep the guys 
> who program the contest loggers (N1MM, etc.) sane. They have a tough enough 
> time now keeping up with contest changes.

Hooey.  I'd rather sponsors try to find a niche with their exchange.
My favorite one is the ARRL November Sweepstakes exchange but that
doesn't mean I think all contests should use it.  As for software,
that's not the sponsor's problem assuming they don't mandate a
particular piece of software.  If software authors want to remain
relevant to their users, they'll keep up.

RST is a nuisance since it adds nothing but makes the QSO longer.
Kudos to BARTG for getting rid of it in the Sprints.


-- 
Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train!
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>