RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] RTTY Cut Numbers

To: "'Bill Turner'" <dezrat@outlook.com>, "'RTTY Reflector'" <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RTTY Cut Numbers
From: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 12:15:36 -0000
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Yes definitely get rid of 599. Do away with anything that is meaningless and
doesn't contribute to contest cross-checking.

Until this happens, refuse to log anyone who skips the RST when it is part
of the contest exchange. This is happening too much now.

John GW4SKA



-----Original Message-----
From: RTTY [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Bill Turner
Sent: 09 January 2016 02:40
To: RTTY Reflector <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RTTY Cut Numbers

------------ ORIGINAL MESSAGE ------------(may be snipped)

On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 16:08:54 -0800, Hank wrote:

>
>We all recognize TOO for 599. So we should all send TOO instead of 
>599--saves at least one SHIFT character.

REPLY:

Better yet, eliminate signal reports from contest exchanges. A few contests
already have. Sponsors, what say you?

73, Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>